%20-%20C.png){kind=small}
Organised crime groups (OCGs) often step into voids left by governments, especially in regions where state presence is weak, governance is ineffective, or public trust in institutions has deteriorated. This is particularly common in areas affected by poverty, political instability, corruption, or conflict. These groups exploit these gaps by establishing themselves as alternative sources of authority, governance, and economic opportunity.
Overview of How OCGs Exploit a Governance Void
In many cases, OCGs provide essential services that governments fail to deliver. For example, they may offer security by acting as informal law enforcers, protecting communities from rival groups or settling disputes. In some instances, they take on the role of service providers, funding or controlling access to utilities like electricity and water or even assisting with transportation and housing. Additionally, they may distribute food, money, or medical care, creating a sense of goodwill and dependency within the communities they serve.
OCGs also exploit economic voids left by ineffective governance. They often become significant sources of employment, offering work in illegal enterprises such as drug trafficking, smuggling, or counterfeit production, which may pay higher wages than legal alternatives. In some cases, they take over local markets by monopolising industries like agriculture or construction, while simultaneously extorting legitimate businesses.
Beyond economic support, OCGs often establish themselves as parallel systems of governance. When state authority diminishes, OCGs may create informal judicial mechanisms to resolve disputes, bypassing official court systems entirely. They may also impose their own taxation systems, collecting money from individuals and businesses within their territories to fund their operations. In regions marked by lawlessness, they often maintain order through a combination of fear and loyalty, ensuring compliance with their rules.
Political instability and corruption provide fertile ground for OCGs to consolidate their power. In environments where government institutions are weak or dysfunctional, OCGs manipulate officials through bribery, coercion, or violence. They often exploit power vacuums in post-conflict zones, consolidating resources and influence when governance structures are fragile. Moreover, they collaborate with corrupt politicians or law enforcement officials, further undermining state authority and embedding themselves into state structures.
Public distrust in the government also works to the advantage of OCGs. When populations lose faith in the state's ability to govern effectively, these groups present themselves as protectors or allies by meeting basic needs, offering security, and mediating local conflicts. They often highlight the state’s failures to govern, reinforcing their role as an alternative source of authority.
During crises such as natural disasters, economic downturns, or pandemics, OCGs act swiftly to exploit the situation. They may distribute aid or supplies more efficiently than the government, earning the gratitude and loyalty of local populations. Simultaneously, they exploit weak controls during crises by smuggling goods, providing counterfeit medicines, or engaging in price gouging.
Examples of Organised Crime Filling the Void
Mexico: Cartels as Parallel Authorities
In Mexico, drug cartels such as the Sinaloa Cartel and the Jalisco New Generation Cartel (CJNG) have entrenched themselves as de facto authorities in many regions where state presence is weak. These cartels provide protection, employment, and even social services to communities, particularly in rural areas. For instance, cartels often construct roads, schools, and clinics to gain local support. They also act as informal law enforcement, resolving disputes and offering 'protection' to businesses, albeit often through coercive tactics. During the COVID-19 pandemic, some cartels distributed food and supplies to struggling families, branding themselves as community benefactors while simultaneously undermining government legitimacy.
Colombia: Guerrilla Groups and Cocaine Economy
In Colombia, groups like the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) and the National Liberation Army (ELN) have historically operated in areas neglected by the government. These groups funded their operations through the cocaine trade and provided local governance in territories under their control. For decades, the FARC built schools, offered medical care, and settled disputes in rural areas where the Colombian government was either absent or ineffective. However, these actions were accompanied by violence, forced recruitment, and the extortion of local populations.
Brasil: Favelas & Gang-Controlled Territories
In Brazil, gangs such as the Comando Vermelho (Red Command) and Primeiro Comando da Capital (First Command of the Capital) dominate many favelas where the government has limited presence. These groups provide essential services, such as distributing food and funding community events, while also enforcing their own rules and punishments. They maintain control through a mix of fear and loyalty, often acting as the primary authority in these areas.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some Brazilian gangs imposed curfews in the favelas to limit the spread of the virus, stepping in where government enforcement was lacking. Despite their role in providing services, these groups are deeply involved in drug trafficking and violent crime, perpetuating cycles of poverty and insecurity.
The Mafia: Governance in Southern Italy
Mafia organisations such as the Cosa Nostra in Sicily, the 'Ndrangheta in Calabria, and the Camorra in Naples have long filled governance gaps in Southern Italy. In areas where the state struggled to enforce laws or provide services, these groups established themselves as arbiters of justice and providers of security. For instance, in rural Sicily, the Cosa Nostra historically resolved land disputes and protected farmers from bandits in exchange for loyalty or payment. The 'Ndrangheta, now one of the most powerful criminal organisations globally, has monopolised legitimate industries such as construction, agriculture, and waste management, while also controlling drug trafficking routes.
The Mafia's influence extends into political and economic spheres, with corruption enabling them to infiltrate state institutions. In some cases, Mafia groups have even organised public works projects, presenting themselves as indispensable to the region’s development while perpetuating cycles of corruption and violence.
Somalia: Piracy & Clan-Based Power Structures
In Somalia, the collapse of the central government in 1991 created a power vacuum that allowed pirate groups and local militias to rise to prominence. In coastal communities where government services and economic opportunities were virtually non-existent, pirates justified their activities as protection against illegal fishing and exploitation by foreign vessels. They funnelled a portion of their earnings from ransom payments back into local communities, funding schools, infrastructure projects, and social services. While this bolstered their popularity among local populations, it also entrenched their control and normalised violent activities.
Afghanistan: The Taliban & the Opium Trade
In Afghanistan, the Taliban has historically filled governance voids in rural areas where the central government had little presence. The group provided security, resolved disputes through Sharia-based courts, and established systems of taxation. Much of their funding comes from the opium trade, which they regulate and protect. Farmers who grow opium poppies often turn to the Taliban for protection and economic stability, as the government has been unable to provide viable alternatives.
The Taliban's ability to offer governance and services in areas neglected by the Afghan government allowed them to build strong local support. However, this was accompanied by strict social controls, forced taxation, and the use of violence to suppress dissent.
Russia: Post-Soviet Organised Crime
After the collapse of the Soviet Union in the 1990s, Russia experienced significant economic and political instability. In the absence of strong state institutions, OCGs stepped in to fill the void. Groups like the Solntsevskaya Bratva became powerful by controlling lucrative industries, including oil, natural gas, and arms trafficking. They also offered protection and financial loans to businesses, effectively replacing state institutions in many regions. These groups often worked in tandem with corrupt officials, blurring the lines between legitimate governance and criminal activity.
Balkans: Post-War Criminal Networks
In the Balkans, the fragmentation of Yugoslavia in the 1990s created conditions for organised crime networks to thrive. These groups smuggled weapons, drugs, and human beings across porous borders, exploiting weak governance and widespread corruption. In some cases, organised crime figures gained political influence, blurring the lines between state and criminal authority. For example, in Kosovo, criminal networks involved in drug trafficking and human smuggling often present themselves as protectors of ethnic communities, leveraging local grievances to build support.
How Has the Financial Crime Compliance Sector Responded
The financial crime industry has developed a comprehensive approach to addressing the challenges posed by OCGs. Its primary goal is to disrupt OCGs operations, dismantle their financial networks, and mitigate the harm they cause to society. This response involves a combination of government regulations, international cooperation, technological innovation, and efforts by financial institutions and private sector organisations.
AML Frameworks
One of the main strategies used to combat OCGs is the implementation of AML frameworks. These frameworks aim to prevent OCGs from legitimising their illicit proceeds through financial systems. Financial institutions play a key role in this process by verifying the identities of their customers through Know Your Customer (KYC) protocols and conducting Customer Due Diligence (CDD) to assess risk levels. If suspicious behaviour is identified, institutions file Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs) with financial intelligence units (FIUs). These reports are used to trace the financial activities of OCGs and uncover their networks. For higher-risk customers, such as politically exposed persons (PEPs) or individuals operating in high-risk jurisdictions, Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) measures are applied.
Targeting Money Laundering Techniques
OCGs often employ sophisticated money laundering techniques, and the financial crime industry has responded by developing targeted strategies to counter these methods. For example, authorities monitor trade-based money laundering (TBML) schemes, where OCGs manipulate trade transactions, such as through over-invoicing or under-invoicing, to move funds. Financial institutions also work to identify and shut down shell companies, which are often used by OCGs as conduits for illicit funds. With the growing use of cryptocurrencies by OCGs, the industry has adapted by implementing blockchain analytics, enforcing the Travel Rule, and regulating virtual asset service providers (VASPs).
Financial Intelligence & Data Sharing
Another crucial element in the fight against OCGs is the sharing of financial intelligence and fostering collaboration between financial institutions, governments, and international organisations. Public-private partnerships, such as the UK's Joint Money Laundering Intelligence Taskforce (JMLIT), facilitate real-time information sharing between banks and law enforcement agencies to disrupt criminal operations. Cross-border cooperation is also essential, with international bodies like the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) and the Egmont Group coordinating efforts to combat money laundering, terrorism financing, and organised crime. Financial institutions increasingly use advanced analytics, such as artificial intelligence and machine learning, to detect patterns and identify red flags associated with OCGs activities.
Asset Tracing & Seizure
Targeting the financial assets of OCGs is another key strategy in disrupting their operations. Governments and financial crime agencies work to freeze and seize assets linked to criminal activities, such as bank accounts, real estate, and luxury items. Tools like Unexplained Wealth Orders (UWOs), as used in the UK, require individuals suspected of serious crimes to explain the origins of their wealth, with non-compliance leading to asset forfeiture. International asset recovery networks, such as the Camden Asset Recovery Inter-Agency Network (CARIN), support cross-border efforts to recover assets, particularly those linked to transnational OCGs.
Combatting Corruption & Insider Threats
Corruption and insider threats pose significant challenges in the fight against OCGs, as these groups often exploit weaknesses within governments, law enforcement, and financial institutions. To address this, the financial crime industry implements strict internal controls and oversight mechanisms. Enhanced scrutiny is applied to transactions involving PEPs, as they may be vulnerable to corruption or collusion with OCGs. Whistleblower protections encourage the reporting of internal misconduct, such as bribery or collusion. Governments also impose strict penalties for compliance failures, incentivising financial institutions to uphold robust anti-corruption measures.
Use of Technology
Technology plays a vital role in combating OCGs, with innovations such as artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) enabling financial institutions to monitor transactions, detect suspicious patterns, and predict high-risk activities. Blockchain forensics tools, like Chainalysis and CipherTrace, are used to trace illicit cryptocurrency transactions, while facial recognition and biometric data enhance identity verification and prevent the use of fake or stolen identities.
International Sanctions
Sanctions regimes are another tool used to target OCGs. Agencies such as the United Nations, the US Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) and the UK Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI) impose sanctions on individuals, entities, and nations associated with organised crime, freezing their assets, restricting travel, and prohibiting financial transactions. These measures disrupt OCGs operations and limit their global reach.
Training & Capacity Building
Training and capacity-building initiatives are critical in the fight against financial crime. Governments, financial institutions, and law enforcement agencies invest in programmes to enhance expertise in combating OCG-linked financial crimes. Organisations like the Association of Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialists (ACAMS), the International Compliance Association (ICA) and FATF provide certifications, resources, and guidance to equip compliance professionals and investigators with the skills needed to address these challenges.
Addressing Socio-Economic Root Causes
Some strategies also focus on addressing the socio-economic root causes that enable OCGs to thrive. Poverty, inequality, and lack of opportunities often drive individuals into organised crime. Development programmes, education initiatives, and community-building efforts aim to reduce the appeal of OCGs by providing alternative pathways for economic and social advancement.
High-Profile Cases & Enforcement Actions
Notable successes in combating OCGs have included high-profile investigations and enforcement actions. For example, the dismantling of the encrypted communication platform EncroChat by Europol and the FBI in 2020 exposed OCGs' criminal activities, leading to numerous arrests and asset seizures across Europe. Additionally, investigations such as the Panama Papers and FinCEN Files uncovered global money laundering schemes, resulting in legal actions against individuals and institutions linked to OCGs.
Despite these efforts, the fight against OCGs remains challenging. These groups adapt quickly to enforcement measures, exploit emerging technologies, and find new avenues for laundering money. Regulatory inconsistencies between jurisdictions and limited resources in developing countries further complicate global efforts. Nevertheless, the financial crime industry continues to evolve, leveraging advanced tools, international cooperation, and community-level initiatives to counter the pervasive threat of organised crime.
Conclusion
In conclusion, OCGs thrive by exploiting the voids left by ineffective governance, particularly in regions plagued by poverty, political instability, corruption, and weak institutional frameworks. They establish themselves as alternative sources of authority, governance, and economic opportunity, often presenting themselves as protectors or benefactors to local populations. However, their activities come with significant costs, including violence, corruption, and entrenched cycles of poverty and insecurity.
The financial crime industry's response to OCGs has been robust and multifaceted, encompassing anti-money laundering frameworks, technological innovations, asset seizure operations, and international cooperation. By targeting OCGs' financial networks, leveraging advanced analytics, and fostering collaboration across borders, the industry aims to dismantle these groups' operations and limit their influence. Additionally, initiatives to address the socio-economic root causes of organised crime provide a more sustainable approach to reducing its appeal.
Despite progress, the fight against OCGs remains complex and challenging. These groups adapt quickly to enforcement measures and exploit emerging technologies to stay ahead. Closing regulatory gaps, strengthening state institutions, and maintaining global cooperation are critical to ensuring that the financial crime industry continues to evolve and remain effective in its efforts to combat organised crime. By addressing these challenges and maintaining vigilance, stakeholders can work toward reducing the pervasive threat posed by OCGs to global stability and security.
Comments